May 29, 2011
To hear Angelenos talk, there’s not enough parking in the city–even though only 30% of our city remains unpaved. That’s right–70% of the land is given over to drivers, and the remnants have to accommodate homes, businesses, schools, parks, libraries, civic buildings, and all the rest.
Yet whenever we as cyclists ask for a shred of asphalt to be given over to us–be it for a bike lane, a cycle track, or a parking corral–space that they owe us!–we hear that “we can’t do that; it will slow down traffic,” or, “It will kill business.”
Yet oddly enough, when you look at places where space has been wrested from greedy drivers and given to cyclists and pedestrians, it seems that life actually gets better –and business gets better too.
New York’s Sadik-Khan closed Times Square to cars, and retail receipts went up 71% in the area. (Car traffic flows better through there too.)

LA’s most expensive Downtown real estate–used for parking!
In Toronto, a car-dependent city somewhat similar to LA, a study found that on Bloor Street, “…Pedestrians, cyclists and transit users account for the bulk of retail spending on Bloor Street West in the Annex neighbourhood. In fact, there is evidence to suggest that efforts to attract more pedestrians and cyclists will have a more positive economic impact on businesses than maintaining the existing parking on the street. On this section of Bloor Street, the existing parking demand can be accommodated by a reduced number of on-street parking spaces combined with the existing off-street parking spaces. It is clear that many merchants in the study area do not view on-street parking as key to their business.”
Even in LA: the Los Angeles Business Journal recently ran a poll and found that over 60% of respondents say that the building code requries too much parking, and that those requirements inhibit development. (See Josef Bray-Ali’s related article there for more details.)
But all Los Angeles can say is that putting in a bike corral (as we wish to do in Hel-Mel) will reduce the city’s income from that lone parking meter, and will make merchants nervous….
Well, historically merchants have almost always been wrong about bikes, cars, and parking, and have opposed every single project that “threatened” car parking–until it was put in, and they made money. Then they’ve wanted more. Happened at Santa Monica’s Third Street Promenade, too.
And you know what? When merchants make more money, they pay more in property and business taxes, and then the city makes more money. Because of the freakin’ bike parking, and the buses, and the pedestrians, and the fact that freakin’ cars aren’t crowding out all the life and commerce! That’s known as “value capture” in scientific (instead of boneheaded) planning circles.
Something LA apparently doesn’t know about. All they can think of is a few coins in parking meters–which they have to pay someone a decent wage to collect and then to count. And some merchant who, based on an unexamined assumption, decides that if you give up one parking space, his business will founder. (Which it won’t.)
We have spent billions over the years to plaster all of LA with macadam. But it’s a major trauma to put a bike corral in Hel-Mel. One guy on Melrose is whining, and the city “doesn’t have” the three or four grand it would take.
Of course, the CRA does have 50 million to give away to help multibillionaire Eli Broad pay for a parking garage downtown for his private museum.
But we can’t afford to put in a bike corral!















The bicycles look perfectly fine and natural…. lets build the infrastructure so this is a normal sight!
Comment by Severin — May 22, 2011 @ 6:18 pm