<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Round &#8216;Em Up!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orange20bikes.com/2011/03/round-em-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orange20bikes.com/2011/03/round-em-up/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 18:02:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bike Parking, BPIT, BAC: Bike-y Meetings This Week and Next &#171; LADOT Bike Blog</title>
		<link>http://orange20bikes.com/2011/03/round-em-up/comment-page-1/#comment-20741</link>
		<dc:creator>Bike Parking, BPIT, BAC: Bike-y Meetings This Week and Next &#171; LADOT Bike Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 01:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orange20bikes.com/?p=3394#comment-20741</guid>
		<description>[...] As an additional flourish, the ordinance has intentionally vague specifications for what types of bike racks to use (beyond some minimum safety measurements) in order to encourage creativity from developers.  Having such broad specifications means that developers could install art racks or innovative new racks without violating the City&#8217;s ordinance.  The ordinance would also allow businesses to count spaces at a nearby bike corral against their bike parking requirement, which would give businesses incentive to support bike corral projects across the City (making it easier to get them installed than it is today). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As an additional flourish, the ordinance has intentionally vague specifications for what types of bike racks to use (beyond some minimum safety measurements) in order to encourage creativity from developers.  Having such broad specifications means that developers could install art racks or innovative new racks without violating the City&#8217;s ordinance.  The ordinance would also allow businesses to count spaces at a nearby bike corral against their bike parking requirement, which would give businesses incentive to support bike corral projects across the City (making it easier to get them installed than it is today). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Universal says no to bikes, Bob Mionske points the finger, Mark Elliot intelligently refutes John Cassidy &#171; BikingInLA</title>
		<link>http://orange20bikes.com/2011/03/round-em-up/comment-page-1/#comment-20728</link>
		<dc:creator>Universal says no to bikes, Bob Mionske points the finger, Mark Elliot intelligently refutes John Cassidy &#171; BikingInLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orange20bikes.com/?p=3394#comment-20728</guid>
		<description>[...] potholes on the street, noting that just 3% of city streets are in good condition. Why does L.A. make it so hard just to park your bike and spend a little money? A Santa Monica writer say drivers aren’t as courteous and alert as they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] potholes on the street, noting that just 3% of city streets are in good condition. Why does L.A. make it so hard just to park your bike and spend a little money? A Santa Monica writer say drivers aren’t as courteous and alert as they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

